---
title: "SourceAnt vs Greptile"
description: "Compare SourceAnt and Greptile for AI code review, repository graphs, custom rules and knowledge that carries between reviews and coding sessions."
url: "https://sourceant.ai/comparison/greptile/"
---

[All comparisons](https://sourceant.ai/comparison)

# SourceAnt vs Greptile

Greptile fits teams that want review grounded in repository graphs, custom rules and feedback. Choose SourceAnt when decisions and constraints need their own shared records, linked to code and systems, with a workflow the team can use during implementation as well as review.

## At a glance

| Compare | Greptile | SourceAnt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Review context | A graph of the repository and adjacent repositories. | Shared decisions and constraints connected to code, systems and reviews. |
| Team knowledge | Custom rules, existing agent instructions and learning from feedback. | Typed decisions, constraints and conventions with relationships and team-controlled status. |
| Coding agents | Knowledge Base MCP available on Pro. | One knowledge store served to connected coding tools over MCP. |
| Deployment | Managed service; Enterprise includes self-hosting. | Managed cloud, a self-hosted open core, or the full platform on-prem. |
| Pricing | Pro uses shared credits without seat fees. | Free cloud plan. Paid platform plans from $49/month, plus model usage. No seat fees. |

## Both tools keep knowledge between reviews

Greptile learns from review feedback, uses existing instruction files and offers Knowledge Base MCP. SourceAnt makes decisions and constraints records with explicit relationships and status. Compare how the team corrects an old rule, retires a superseded decision and retrieves the current guidance in its coding tools.

[See SourceAnt’s decision records](https://sourceant.ai/knowledge-graph)

## The system around the repository matters too

Greptile builds a graph of the repository and adjacent repositories. SourceAnt combines its code graph with a system map and recorded constraints. That lets a team keep a service relationship and the decision governing it together, then use that context when reviewing a change that reaches another repository.

[See systems and cross-repository review](https://sourceant.ai/systems)

## Pricing

Greptile Pro charges by shared credits with no seat fees; Enterprise includes self-hosting. SourceAnt also has no seat fees. Its paid cloud platform starts at $49 a month plus model usage, and its open core can be self-hosted. Compare the same review volume and deployment requirements.

[SourceAnt pricing and workload calculator](https://sourceant.ai/pricing)

## When Greptile is the better fit

Greptile already combines persistent learning, MCP knowledge access and cross-repository context. SourceAnt needs to earn a switch through its knowledge workflow or deployment fit, not through capabilities Greptile already provides.

## Bring your team’s decisions into the next review.

Connect a repository and capture a decision your team already made. See how SourceAnt brings that context into your agents’ work and code reviews.

[Start free](https://app.sourceant.ai/)[Read the setup guide](https://sourceant.ai/docs/getting-started)

## Related comparisons

-   [SourceAnt vs Augment Context Engine](https://sourceant.ai/comparison/augment)
-   [SourceAnt vs Claude Code Review](https://sourceant.ai/comparison/claude-code-review)
-   [SourceAnt vs GitHub Copilot](https://sourceant.ai/comparison/github-copilot)
-   [SourceAnt vs CodeRabbit](https://sourceant.ai/comparison/coderabbit)
-   [SourceAnt vs Qodo](https://sourceant.ai/comparison/qodo)
-   [SourceAnt vs cubic](https://sourceant.ai/comparison/cubic)